Droids and The Force: How the Science in ‘Star Wars’ Is Actually Real

For a story that takes place “a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away” a great deal of the technology in the “Star Wars” series actually has parallels today on planet Earth. Part of the reason is, ironically, how long the franchise has been around. Concepts and ideas that were the stuff of science fiction when the first “Star Wars” movie came out in 1977 have had almost four decades of science to become real.

Here’s a look at a few of the technologies and scenes that you can tell fellow moviegoers are actually the real deal:

Lasers and Energy Weapons: “Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid.” Han Solo warned Luke Skywalker when they met in “Star Wars: A New Hope,” and some 30 years later in “The Force Awakens” he’s still packing the same blaster he shot first with. But while Ronald Reagan was inspired back then to try to build his own version of what became known as “Star Wars” weapons to fend off the Soviets, such energy weapons like blasters and laser cannons were pure science fiction. Today, though, the U.S. Navy has deployed lasers aboard warships like the USS Ponce in the Persian Gulf to defend against drones and small boats, while testing is under way for more powerful truck-mounted and airplane-mounted lasers. Similarly, the electromagnetic rail gun that was one of the many defenses of the first Death Star will be tested for deployment onto U.S. warships like the USS Zumwalt (the star, in turn, of our book “Ghost Fleet”), while China is working on its own version.

Stormtrooper Armor and Women at War: Part of why lasers are so common in “Star Wars” is the prevalence of suits of armor that can defeat old-school bullets (but importantly not Ewok stones). The Stormtroopers of the new “First Order” in “The Force Awakens” are a sleek next generation, culminating in Captain Phasma’s intimidating chrome version. The real world version is the Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit, or TALOS, a project involving 10 national laboratories, 13 universities, 16 government agencies, and 56 companies, all working together to build the powered armor suit for U.S. Special Forces of the future. In both “Star Wars” and real wars, though, the clothes don’t make the man or woman. While women in earlier movies were mostly damsels in distress, that Captain Phasma is a woman makes her no less fearsome a combat leader, just as women have taken on more active roles in the U.S. military, including recently completing U.S. Army Ranger school.

Droids: The new movie will feature a range of new robots, like the cute BB-8 as well as old friends like R2-D2. While they may not chirp and burble in the real world, real robots have already become a staple of the modern battlefield. Thousands of all shapes and size already serve in the U.S. military, from the MQ-9 Reaper in the air or the Packbot on the ground. And, if the U.S. Air Force’s strategic plan for the future comes true, they soon will be flying as wingmen alongside manned fighters; imagine if droids didn’t ride in the back of the X-wing fighter but flew on their own.

Space Battles: Fighting it out in the vacuum of space is a staple of science fiction, but is also becoming a key part of war plans. Unlike back in 1977, space is now the nervous system of the modern military. Over 1100 communication satellites link planes, missiles and troops in the field (80% of overall communications the U.S. military sends goes through satellites), look down to spy on every movement on land, air and sea, and run navigation networks such as GPS that are used not just to guide trucks and tanks (and your car), but also to place missiles on targets with an accuracy of centimeters. As a result, the U.S., China and Russia are all at work on space weaponry of some sort to take this advantage away from their foes, ranging from U.S.and Chinese tests of anti-satellite missiles (notably, the test shot of one missile was described as causing “an explosion worthy of the ‘Star Wars’ franchise”) to Russian work on killer kamikaze-style satellites. Or, the space systems could mount weapons themselves. In another example of science fiction crossing with science reality, astronomers at UC Irvine are exploring the mounting of a laser on the International Space Station in 2017, in order to destroy any threatening space debris…or attacking TIE fighters.

Lightsabers: While high-powered lasers and kinetic kill vehicles may be used in space combat, they are also “clumsy and random” as Obi-Wan Kenobi warned, requiring a more “elegant weapon” for close-in fights. So too, if you wanted to capture a valuable orbital asset (such as International Space Station or the “Tiāngōng,” China’s planned space station set to go operational around 2022), you wouldn’t be able to use guns, as they’d damage and depressurize the very thing you were trying to seize. That’s why future space battles may also involve hand-to-hand combat with a mix of ancient and new weapons. Think sabers and Tasers, rather than lightsabers.

Tractor Beams and Holograms: The “Star Wars” story began with an opening scene of a spaceship being pulled in by a tractor beam, whereupon a holographic emergency message was recorded to the Rebel Alliance’s “only hope.” These two technologies have been combined today in the “holographic acoustic elements framework,”research that has shown off the ability to “levitate objects of different sizes and materials through air, water and tissue.” In the real world, though, its goal is to move tiny objects without touching them, such as for microsurgery without cutting open the body.

Mind Control and The Force: It wasn’t just starships that could move objects from afar, but also the Jedi, in their case by thought alone. Even more, they could manipulate other peoples’ thoughts. While the U.S. military does have a team of strategists at the School of Advanced Military Studies known as the Jedi, the real-world parallel is more through technology, not mythical “midichlorians.” Brain-machine interfaces, such as the Braingate project, turn your thoughts into digital signals that can go out to control machines, such as a bionic hand (Luke’s artificial hand actually looks a bit dated compared to the real world DEKA, a bionic, mind-controlled hand approved by the FDA last year). In turn, projects such as DARPA’s Systems-Based Neurotechnology for Emerging Therapies, or SUBNETs, program are designed to send signals back into the brain, reshaping thoughts and memories. They initially designed for treatment of maladies that range from Parkinson’s disease to PTSD.

What Isn’t There: What’s also interesting are technologies we take for granted today but didn’t exist in the movies. The Internet didn’t exist back in 1977, either in the movies and arguably the real world. Princess Leia couldn’t just send an email to Obi-Wan Kenobi, nor could Luke learn his Jedi training by watching Yoda training videos on YouTube. In 1977, the entire world of networked computers could be laid out in a map of just over 50 nodes on what was then called ARPANET, and the word “cyberspace” wouldn’t even be coined for another five years. Today, the Internet is integral to the continuing popularity of the franchise, as a place to watch the latest trailers, share the latest fan reactions, buy the latest toys, or just geek out over all the cool science fiction of “Star Wars” turning into science reality.

Why Are the Star Wars Prequels Hated So Much?

Why ask why ????

Just because they’re not as good as the first trilogy, and the expectations were high.

And also because they’re just really bad movies in their own right. People talk about how the prequels dragged down the original trilogy, but what they don’t talk about is how the prequels would never have been any kind of box office hit without the original trilogy to give them a readymade support base. If Phantom Menace had been the first Star Wars movie made, then it would just be a forgotten-about series of movies by now with only a limited fanbase.

A big part of the appeal of the original trilogy was the simple battle between good and evil. Darth Vader and Emperor were bad, and Luke and Co. weren’t, and the bad guys wanted to wipe the good guys out, so war ensued, and good films were the result.

But the prequels were about trade disputes. Name a single good film ever made about a trade dispute. There was a lot of standing around talking about stuff and having votes in senates and generally not doing interesting things with lightsabers. It was dull—even worse, it was badly written dull. If I’m going to watch people talk about trade disputes, then I want to watch interesting characters delivering snappy dialogue. I don’t want to spend my time listening to terrible writing while wondering, “Why the hell are these evil capitalists speaking with Asian accents? What’s that all about?”

The original trilogy had one of the most iconic villains in movie history and put him against some truly charismatic heros. AFI listed the greatest heroes and villains of all time in 2003. Darth Vader comes in at No. 3 on the bad guys list, and Han Solo at No. 14 on the list of good guys supported by Obi Wan Kenobi (the Alec Guiness, original trilogy version) at No. 37. No characters from the prequels trouble the list at all, and how could they? The closest thing they have to an interesting bad guy is Darth Maul, and he’s only in the trilogy for about 15 minutes. The only interesting good guy is Obi Wan, and that’s mainly because McGregor is doing an Alec Guinness impression.

The original trilogy gave us a great story arc with an incredibly exciting conclusion. At the end of Return of the Jedi, we watched as the good guys fell into a trap. Han and Leia were captured on Endor, the fleet was about to be blown up by the Death Star, and Luke was considering a move to the dark side. The good guys were losing and it was hard to see any way out.

At the end of the third prequel, we watched a long and drawn out lightsaber battle between four protagonists (Yoda versus Palpatine and Obi-wan versus Anakin) who we knew were going to survive anyway. There was no tension, no excitement, just a sense of relief that it was all finally ending.

We could probably have forgiven the incredibly bad dialogue, pointless plots, and lack of character if the universe hadn’t been populated with added irritation. Jar Jar was a huge mistake on every level. He wasn’t funny at all, and the need to insert him into every scene made him even more annoying. He bumbled around in the background of conversations, he stepped in shit, got farted on, and generally behaved like the cheapest comic relief character there was. And he never had a moment of redemption. He never redeemed himself with any courage or moment of intuition; he just screwed up throughout the entire movie. The original trilogy didn’t need a purely comic relief character—it was able to intuitively find comedic moments in the course of the movie. Jar Jar, along with the two incredibly annoying Anakins, were just irritating throughout the entire trilogy.

But that alone isn’t enough to inspire hatred. The prequels are boring and annoying and soulless, but then so are lots of other movies. The reason everyone should hate them is because they take away from the original trilogy. Before they made the prequels, Anakin Skywalker was a good pilot lured to the dark side of the force. But now we know he’s a whiny and annoying kid and a hopelessly acted romantic fool and inexplicably the guy who designed C3PO and R2D2’s best friend. And Darth Vader wasn’t the baddest of the bad who had his moment of redemption—he was a hopeless loser shouting a hilariously awful “Noooooo” to the heavens.

They’re just bad movies. And they’re bad movies that made great movies kind of worse. No wonder people hate them.

Good Morning…Greeley!

Blink. Blink. Blink.

It’s the dreaded cursor-on-a-blank-screen experience all writers — amateur or professional, aspiring or experienced — know and dread. And nowhere does it plague writers more than when they’re writing their intros.

I mean, you already have a blog post you want to write. Can’t you just dive in and write it? Why all the pomp and circumstance with this dag-blasted introduction!?

Well, intros don’t have to be long (in fact, I prefer them to be quite quick), nor do they have to be hard. But they do have to exist. They tee the reader up for the content they’re about to read, and provide context for the rest of your post.

So let’s break down exactly how to write an introduction that’s short, effective, and relatively painless. If you’re ever having trouble churning out those intros, come back here and re-read this formula to lift yourself out of that writing rut.

Hello Posse……………..

My mom lives out on a big piece of land in the sticks. I’m no fisherman, but from time to time we take our little tin row boat out into the middle of her pond and drop a line. I’ve come to realize that the only thing worse than not getting a bite, is losing the tug of war between one that you’ve got hooked. Losing a good catch is a lot like losing a valuable website visitor. It’s not uncommon for someone to visit your site, browse one page, and then bounce.

How to tell Star Wars bedtime stories

 

One thing that Emma and Malakai all have in common is that they love Star Wars—which is really fun for me, since I really love Star Wars too. The story has fascinated four generations of my family and has inspired hours and hours of drawing, Legos, and play in our house.

Like most parents, we have had some difficulty in getting our kids to go to bed. But, now they are doing much better, and we have a bit of a routine. After Carmen plays the guitar and sings to them, I’ve been telling them a bedtime story out in the hall between the two bedrooms. They aren’t content anymore with our collection of children’s stories; they want me to create stories on-demand, ideally with themselves as the main protagonists. I feel for those cartoonists who have to try to come up with a funny storyline every day for the newspaper. It is sometimes difficult to come up with fresh, interesting stories right on the spot. But, it is made so much easier with a little help from our Star Wars friends. Here’s my strategy:

  1. I spend a few minutes during the day, or right before the story, thinking about the things the kids are worried, anxious, or excited about (such as going to the dentist)—or some skill or attribute that they need to develop (like sharing, understanding what are choking hazards, cleaning up, taking care of younger siblings, or being brave). Then, I work it into the story.
  2. The story does not have to be complex  or rely on the various literary devices you find in Shakespeare or Dickens. To impress our 7 and 3 year-olds, I just need to make it surprising, funny, and memorable. This is amazingly easy to do if you simply inject Yoda, Darth Vader, or Storm Troopers into ordinary situations. Emma likes the story where she was playing hide-and-go-seek, and hid under a picnic table only to find Yoda hiding from George Lucas. Malakai likes the one where he was drawing Yoda and AT-AT Walkers, and Emma and Lily jumped into his drawing (kind of like C.S. Lewis’s The Voyage of the Dawn Treader).
  3. The most important rule when using Star Wars characters in bedtime stories is that they are not bad guys. You can use whatever character you want, even Darth Vader or the Emperor known for hideous atrocities, but they cannot be evil. They can make bad choices (like not cleaning up their mess or being grumpy), but they can’t be scary. Otherwise, the kids won’t sleep.
  4. Well, “no bad guys” is probably the only rule. There is quite a bit of leeway otherwise. It’s just fine for Padme and Vader to take their kids Leia and Luke to Disneyland. It’s okay for Jango Fett to go Trick-or-Treating with Luke Skywalker—though, Johnny suggested that I probably meant Boba Fett.
  5. Bonus points are obtained for speaking like the characters. I found, in high school during the re-release of Star Wars, that I can do a pretty good Yoda voice, not too far off from that of Frank Oz. It takes a little practice to rearrange word orderings to make a convincing Yoda, but it is not hard. My vocal skills have not really expanded beyond Yoda. I’m trying to work on my C-3PO and Chewbacca—on my own in the car on the way to work, since I don’t think it’s at a point where I’m comfortable enough to test it on my kids yet.
  6. Feel free to add characters as necessary. The kids really enjoyed the invention of Yoda’s wife Yoma, and their four kids: Yoemma, Yojohn, Yolily, and Yoanna. (Of course, the Jedi Order prohibits marriage, but the rules can be bent for bedtime stories.)
  7. Kids like recurring themes. So, a few things happen often in these stories. Baby Anna spits up (for example, on a Storm Trooper when he picks her up). Baby Anna says “Ga ga goo goo” in response to a serious question from Darth Vader or the like. That always makes the kids crack up.
  8. All stories end with the kids going to sleep in their beds. I often get a little bit absorbed in the story, and go on and on, but it is pretty easy to wrap it up with a run-on sentence like “the kids decided to return home from the Dagobah system because it was getting late, and so they jumped in the Millennium Falcon, zoomed back to Earth, crawled into their beds, and went to sleep.” At the end, Emma adds, “just like us.”

After I started telling my kids these stories, Carmen’s sister pointed me toDarth Vader and Son by Jeffrey Brown. It isn’t a story book, but it’s a collection of absolutely hilarious comics, and the kids enjoyed it just as much as me. The follow on story, Vader’s Little Princess is available on pre-order from Amazon and will be coming out soon.

Are there Star Wars fans in your house?